close icon

Bitcoin Falls Because of a 13th Century Mathematician

The price of Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency out there,  just fell to its lowest level since the start of the year. The previous major low of $5920, registered in early-February, has finally been breached. BTCUSD is currently hovering around $5850, which brings its total loss for the week to 9.3%.

But why is Bitcoin crashing this time? Maybe it has something to do with Japan’s financial regulator, which appears to have renewed its crackdown on cryptocurrency exchanges. Maybe it has something to do with Bithumb, the South Korean exchange, from which hackers recently stole $30 million worth of digital tokens. Maybe, but we have a simpler explanation and it has something to do with this man:
leonardo fibonacci mathematician
Please, accept our apologies, but we could not find a photo of him. This is Leonardo Fibonacci – a 13th century Italian mathematician, known for his discovery of the famous sequence of numbers named after him, from which several very interesting “Fibonacci ratios” derive from. 0.618, 1.618 and 0.382 are the three Fibonacci ratios, which not only appear to govern a number of complex structures in nature, but have their place in the financial markets, as well. 0.382 in particular seems to be the very reason for this week’s Bitcoin selloff. The chart below was sent to our subscribers as a short-term update on Wednesday, June 20th, while BTCUSD was still holding above $6620. It shows that the largest cryptocurrency reversed to the south shortly after touching the 38.2% level.
bitcoin fibonacci resistance
Fibonacci analysis cannot be conducted on its own, because the analyst would not know what to measure and will end up finding Fibonacci ratios all over the place. In order to recognize a reliable Fibonacci support or resistance level, one must put it into the context of the Elliott Wave Principle – a pattern recognition technique, which states that price trends develop in repetitive patterns, called waves. A five-wave sequence, called an impulse, indicates the direction of the larger trend and that is exactly what we thought was in progress on the 2-hour chart of BTCUSD shown above. The only problem was that its fifth wave – v -was still missing.

The good news was that the recovery between $6120 and $6842 looked like a w-x-y double zigzag correction, which fit perfectly in the position of wave iv. In addition, fourth waves usually terminate after retracing 38.2% of the previous third wave. Four days ago, Elliott Wave and Fibonacci analysis combined suggested that as long as $6842 was intact, more weakness in the price of Bitcoin should be expected. The updated chart below shows how things went.
bitcoin elliott wave crash
The bulls made an effort, but $6842 survived. From then on the bears took control of the situation and dragged the price to a new of $5833 so far. But please, do not blame Leonardo Fibonacci for the crash. He did not invent the ratio, he simply discovered it. And we are so glad he did, because it adds another layer of precision to the arsenal of the Elliott Wave analyst.

What will Bitcoin bring this week? That is the subject of discussion in the next premium analysis due out later TODAY! If you want to master the Elliott Wave principle yourself, our eBook Elliott Wave guide is here to help you!



Stay informed with our newsletter

Latest Elliott Wave analysis on different topics delivered to you weekly.

Privacy policy
You may also like:

Bitcoin Selloff Crushes Bulls’ Faith in $6k Support

The last several months have been unusually quiet for the price of Bitcoin. The largest cryptocurrency first touched the support area near $6000 in February and has been testing it multiple times since. This support looked so strong for so long that traders and investors started believing BTCUSD was getting ready for the next major…

Read More »

Elliott Wave Ahead of Bitcoin ‘s Goldman-Inspired Crash

Bitcoin was trading above $7400 on Wednesday morning, following a recovery from as low as $5880. Crypto investors hoped the rally will continue, but they could not predict that just a few hours later Goldman Sachs will say it is abandoning its plans to establish a cryptocurrency trading desk, citing the ambiguous regulatory environment as…

Read More »

Bitcoin and BitMEX Trading Halt in Elliott Wave Context

Bitcoin shot up by over $400 in as little as 20 minutes today in a move some crypto experts attributed to a short squeeze during BitMEX’s scheduled maintenance. Unfortunately, BitMEX’s trading halt can explain the surge only in hindsight, which means even crypto experts did not expect it. For example, Don Le, CEO of ChainRock…

Read More »

Another Week, Another Bitcoin Bloodbath

Another week, another bloodbath for Bitcoin. The largest cryptocurrency climbed to $6815 on Monday, but the bulls quickly lost control and suffered a sharp plunge to $6072 four days later on Thursday. And while bullish predictions by crypto “experts” still call for $60 000 by the end of the year or $280 000 by 2023,…

Read More »

Four Days Ahead of Bitcoin’s “Red Sunday”

Bitcoin is plunging yet again. Following a small recovery from $7027 to $7791 in the first week of the month, BTCUSD just breached the support of $7200 and still seems to be in a downward spiral from its December 2017 high of $19 666. But let’s ignore the bubble-or-not-a-bubble talk for a moment and concentrate…

Read More »

EOS Crypto Bulls Ready for a New Record High

In just two short weeks, EOS – the fifth largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization – fell from an all-time high of $23.03 to as low as $12.05, losing almost 48% of its value. As the price of EOS is approaching the $15 mark now, traders are wondering what to expect from now on – more weakness…

Read More »

Bitcoin: UpBit Fraud Scandal Just a Catalyst

After the price of Bitcoin rose twenty-fold in 2017, the majority of crypto investors were expecting even bigger gains in 2018 as the digital currency was finally entering the mainstream. Alas, so far that is not the case as BTCUSD plunged by roughly 70% in just a month and a half. But instead of going…

Read More »

More analyses