close icon

Bitcoin Proves Traders Can Prepare without “Knowing”

The price of Bitcoin slightly breached the psychological level of $3500 yesterday and still has not been able to escape its gravity as of this writing. The current selloff brought back the memories of the time when BTCUSD fell to $3122 a month ago.

And while in the markets everyone is an expert in retrospect, the question really worth discussing is how could traders prepare in advance for this decline in the market’s increasingly uncertain environment?

We cannot speak for everyone, but our way of dealing with uncertainty involves Elliott Wave analysis. For instance, our subscribers received the following chart on Sunday, January 6th, when Bitcoin was still hovering around $3800.

Bitcoin Elliott Wave analysis predicting decline to $3500

The 30-minute chart of Bitcoin against the U.S. dollar revealed that even though its fourth wave was bigger in relation to the second, the rally from $3122 to $4237 could be seen as a five-wave impulse, labeled i-ii-iii-iv-v.

An Alternative Count in Mind

According to the theory, a three-wave correction in the other direction follows every impulse. Here, our primary count suggested the drop from $4237 to $3566 was a simple a-b-c zigzag, which completed the whole 5-3 wave cycle.

On the other hand, the alternative count, shown above, acknowledged the possibility that the recovery from $3566 might be only wave x) of a larger w)-x)-y) double zigzag, which was still in progress.

Under this scenario, Bitcoin was also looking bullish in the short-term, but the resistance near $4100 was going to be a tough nut to crack for the bulls. Caution was advised in that area. Less than three days later, BTCUSD had already reached it.

Bitcoin allows for two alternative Elliott Wave counts

Bitcoin climbed to $4112 on January 8th. The chart above was sent to our subscribers as a short-term update the very next day, January 9th.

There was clearly no point in pretending that we knew what was going to happen. Both the positive and the negative outlook were still possible, so our only option was to keep both in mind and find something to tell us when the odds have tilted in favor of one of them.

A Single Line Made the Difference for Bitcoin Traders

The green support line drawn through the last three swing lows seemed important. A bearish breakout there would invalidate the bullish outlook and in the same time confirm the bearish alternative. Our opinion was that “below this line … the price is likely to decline to $3500 or lower.” Then this happened:

Bitcoin falls below $3900 putting the bears on the wheel

The price of Bitcoin breached the rising line of support on January 10th and put the bears in the driving seat with targets around $3500. BTCUSD fell to $3503 the same day and to $3476 on January 13th.

“Uncertainty” is practically synonymous with “markets.” Ever since trade exists, there has never been anything certain for market participants. A hard lesson was to be learnt by those who at one time or another thought they were guaranteed to make money.

Fortunately, the way Bitcoin has been developing in the last week proves that traders can prepare even though they cannot know.

What will BTCUSD bring next week? That is the subject of discussion in our next premium analysis due out late Sunday!



Stay informed with our newsletter

Latest Elliott Wave analysis on different topics delivered to you weekly.

Privacy policy
You may also like:

Bitcoin ‘s 40% Surge didn’t Come Out of Nowhere

On Thursday, we showed you how Elliott Wave analysis set the stage for a Bitcoin plunge to under $7700 ten days before Mark Zuckerberg’s Libra testimony. The cryptocurrency was barely holding above $7400 at the time of writing and many thought it was prone to decline even further. Since Bitcoin is among our premium instruments,…

Read More »

BTCUSD: Libra Testimony Didn’t Cause the Fall

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress on October 23rd about the company’s Libra cryptocurrency project. The hearing didn’t go as smooth as the crypto community hoped, which reflected on the price of digital assets such as Bitcoin. At one point on Wednesday, BTCUSD was down by over $750 for the day. But was Zuckerberg’s Libra…

Read More »

The Bears Rule Over Ethereum Under $225

We last wrote about Ethereum on August 9th. The second largest cryptocurrency had plunged by 42% in less than two months and was hovering around $210. Unfortunately, our Elliott Wave analysis of the decline from $363 pointed to more weakness ahead. See the chart below to refresh your memory. This chart was included in our…

Read More »

Staying Two Weeks Ahead of Bitcoin ‘s Crash to $8000

The price of Bitcoin has been slowly losing ground since late-June when it touched $13 880. The bulls have been relying on the support near $9000 for over two months. They no longer have that luxury. BTCUSD was still gravitating around $10 000 on September 23rd. The next day, it plunged to $7998. While the…

Read More »

Bitcoin Fulfills Yesterday’s Bearish Elliott Wave Setup

The price of Bitcoin plunged sharply on Wednesday and keeps falling early Thursday. BTCUSD reached an intraday high of $10 280, before crashing to as low as $9555 yesterday. Today, the bears are still in charge and managed to drag the price to $9320 so far. To sum it up, Bitcoin lost almost $1000 per…

Read More »

Litecoin Lost 50% in Two Months. Is the Pain Over?

Litecoin, the fifth largest cryptocurrency, lost more than half of its market value in the past two months. Between June 22nd and August 21st, LTCUSD fell from $146 to $70. Since crypto assets have no intrinsic value, investors often compare the current price to its higher level some time ago. This leads them to the…

Read More »

Ethereum Made a Decision the Bulls Won’t Like

A month and a half ago, Ethereum was hovering in the vicinity of $340 a coin. The bulls seemed unstoppable after lifting the price by over 320% in six months. Unfortunately, an invisible threat was brewing under the surface. Instead of simply extrapolating the recent uptrend into the future, we thought it appropriate to take…

Read More »

More analyses